Peer Reviewed

1

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-8-2017

Keywords

Awareness, Evidence-Based Medicine, Female, Fetal Distress, Fetal Monitoring, Fetal Movement, Gestational Age, Health Promotion, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Ireland, Male, Multilevel Analysis, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Patient Compliance, Pregnancy, Pregnant Women, Prenatal Care, Stillbirth, United Kingdom

Funder/Sponsor

Scottish Government (CZH/4/882), Tommy’s and Sands, the Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity. NHS Lothian via the Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR; CS-2013-009).

Comments

The original article is available at bmjopen.bmj.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2013, the stillbirth rate in the UK was 4.2 per 1000 live births, ranking 24th out of 49 high-income countries, with an annual rate of reduction of only 1.4% per year. The majority of stillbirths occur in normally formed infants, with (retrospective) evidence of placental insufficiency the most common clinical finding. Maternal perception of reduced fetal movements (RFM) is associated with placental insufficiency and increased risk of subsequent stillbirth.This study will test the hypothesis that the introduction of a package of care to increase women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and standardised management to identify fetal compromise with timely delivery in confirmed cases, will reduce the rate of stillbirth. Following the introduction of a similar intervention in Norway the odds of stillbirth fell by 30%, but the efficacy of this intervention (and possible adverse effects and implications for service delivery) has not been tested in a randomised trial.

METHODS: We describe a stepped-wedge cluster trial design, in which participating hospitals in the UK and Ireland will be randomised to the timing of introduction of the care package. Outcomes (including the primary outcome of stillbirth) will be derived from detailed routinely collected maternity data, allowing us to robustly test our hypothesis. The degree of implementation of the intervention will be assessed in each site. A nested qualitative study will examine the acceptability of the intervention to women and healthcare providers and identify process issues including barriers to implementation.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the Scotland A Research Ethics Committee (Ref 13/SS/0001) and from Research and Development offices in participating maternity units. The study started in February 2014 and delivery of the intervention completed in December 2016. Results of the study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to local investigating sites to inform education and care of women presenting with RFM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01777022.

VERSION: Protocol Version 4.2, 3 February 2017.

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences | Obstetrics and Gynecology

Citation

Heazell AEP, Weir CJ, Stock SJE, Calderwood CJ, Burley SC, Froen JF, Geary M, Hunter A, McAuliffe FM, Murdoch E, Rodriguez A, Ross-Davie M, Scott J, Whyte S, Norman JE. Can promoting awareness of fetal movements and focusing interventions reduce fetal mortality? A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial (AFFIRM). BMJ Open. 2017;7(8):e014813.

PubMed ID

28801392

DOI Link

10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014813

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Share

COinS