Surveillance and endemic vancomycin-resistant enterococci: some success in control is possible.

M Morris-Downes, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
E G. Smyth, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
J Moore, Beaumont Hopsital, Dublin
T Thomas, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
F Fitzpatrick, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
J Walsh, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
V Caffrey, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
A Morris, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
S Foley, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin
Hilary Humphreys, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland

The original publication is available at


Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are prevalent in many Irish hospitals. We analysed surveillance data from 2001 to 2008 in a centre where VRE is endemic. All clinically significant enterococci were tested for susceptibility to vancomycin. All intensive care unit admissions were screened on admission and weekly thereafter. Interventions included isolating/cohorting VRE patients, monthly prevalence surveys of VRE patients, the introduction of an electronic alert system, programmes to improve hand and environmental hygiene, and the appointment of an antibiotic pharmacist. There was a significant increase in the number of positive VRE screening samples from 2001 (1.96 patients with positive VRE screens per 10 000 bed-days) to 2006 (4.98 per 10 000 bed-days) (P < or = 0.001) with a decrease in 2007 (3.18 per 10 000 bed-days) (P < or = 0.01). The number of VRE bloodstream infections (BSI) increased from 0.09 BSI per 10 000 bed-days in 2001 to 0.78 per 10 000 bed-days in 2005 (P < or = 0.001) but decreased subsequently. Linear regression analysis indicated a significant association between new cases of VRE and non-isolated VRE patients, especially between May 2005 and December 2006 [P=0.009; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08-0.46] and between May 2005 and December 2008 (P = 0.008; 95% CI: 0.06-0.46). Routine surveillance for VRE together with other measures can control VRE BSI and colonisation, even where VRE is endemic, and where facilities are constrained.