Peer Reviewed

1

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

16-5-2015

Keywords

Learning healthcare system, Data-mining, international classification of primary care, Diagnosis, Reason for encounter, Urinary tract infection, Pyelonephritis, Transform, Transition project, Electronic patient record.

Funder/Sponsor

European Commission - DG INFSO

Comments

The original article is available at www.biomedcentral.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Analysis of encounter data relevant to the diagnostic process sourced from routine electronic medical record (EMR) databases represents a classic example of the concept of a learning healthcare system (LHS). By collecting International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) coded EMR data as part of the Transition Project from Dutch and Maltese databases (using the EMR TransHIS), data mining algorithms can empirically quantify the relationships of all presenting reasons for encounter (RfEs) and recorded diagnostic outcomes. We have specifically looked at new episodes of care (EoC) for two urinary system infections: simple urinary tract infection (UTI, ICPC code: U71) and pyelonephritis (ICPC code: U70).

METHODS: Participating family doctors (FDs) recorded details of all their patient contacts in an EoC structure using the ICPC, including RfEs presented by the patient, and the FDs' diagnostic labels. The relationships between RfEs and episode titles were studied using probabilistic and data mining methods as part of the TRANSFoRm project.

RESULTS: The Dutch data indicated that the presence of RfE's "Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection", "Dysuria", "Fear of UTI", "Urinary frequency/urgency", "Haematuria", "Urine symptom/complaint, other" are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis "Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection" . The Maltese data indicated that the presence of RfE's "Dysuria", "Urinary frequency/urgency", "Haematuria" are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis "Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection". The Dutch data indicated that the presence of RfE's "Flank/axilla symptom/complaint", "Dysuria", "Fever", "Cystitis/Urinary Tract Infection", "Abdominal pain/cramps general" are all strong, reliable, predictors for the diagnosis "Pyelonephritis" . The Maltese data set did not present any clinically and statistically significant predictors for pyelonephritis.

CONCLUSIONS: We describe clinically and statistically significant diagnostic associations observed between UTIs and pyelonephritis presenting as a new problem in family practice, and all associated RfEs, and demonstrate that the significant diagnostic cues obtained are consistent with the literature. We conclude that it is possible to generate clinically meaningful diagnostic evidence from electronic sources of patient data.

Disciplines

Medicine and Health Sciences

Citation

Soler JK, Corrigan D, Kazienko P, Kajdanowicz T, Danger R, Kulisiewicz M, Delaney B.

PubMed ID

25980623

DOI Link

10.1186/s12875-015-0271-4

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Additional file 1.xlsx (20 kB)
Raw exported data from KNIME data mining tool used to create Table S1andTable S2.

Additional file 2.pdf (212 kB)
Table S3.. Showing positive likelihood ratios for associated RfEs (label and ICPC code listed) and the episode title “UTI” in two populations.

Additional file 3.pdf (202 kB)
Table S4.. Showing positive likelihood ratios for associated RfEs (label and ICPC code listed) and the episode title “pyelonephritis” in two populations.

Share

COinS